This paper explores existing frameworks in the law of armed conflict which could be used for the emerging threat of doxing. This phenomenon appears to have happened in countries like Ukraine and Myanmar. As civilians share greater and more personal swaths of information online, and certain states develop wide-reaching control of the internet, doxing could be used to draw targets on the backs of particular groups. Doxing is the process of publishing private information about an individual or organization, often as a form of punishment.ĭoxing is often thought of in reference to political scandals or corporate leaks, but it could be used in a wartime setting as well. This paper reckons with another way war might expand out of its traditional box: the use and abuse of civilian data through doxing. States leverage sanctions in the hopes of weakening their opponents or the opponents of their allies, and information operations seek to change the “truth” of what happens on the ground. Modern war has spilled off the battlefield. This is cutting-edge analysis, so don’t miss it!Īs warfare evolves, so must the law of armed conflict. Riley will explain how existing law might apply, highlight the legal challenges, and offer ideas about the way ahead. We’ve already seen its criminal use, but now doxing is being weaponized for employment in both international and non-international armed conflicts–and it’s being perpetrated by state and non-state actors. In a brilliant analysis – “ Not Just Words: Grappling with the Doxing of Civilians in War“– Duke Law 3L Riley Flewelling expertly unpacks this phenomena. The latest installment of the LENS Essay Series has some answers for you. Do you know what “doxing” (sometimes spelled “doxxing”) is? Do you understand how it might be used in wartime? How should the law of armed conflict treat it?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |